Fig Variety Details

Fig Variety Main Info

Variety
Franciscana
Our Figs Varieties List
n/a
P
Yes
Goto

see also Black Mission

NPGS ID
AKA
Description
Condit

(syns. Mission, California Black, Negra, Brebal, Douro Vebra, Biberaeo, Reculver, Gouraud Noir, Gourreau du Languedoc, probably Noire d’Espagne, Gourreau Noir). Described by Carbon (1865b), Hogg (1866), West (1882), Escribano y Pérez (1884), Barron (1891), Lelong (1892), Shinn (1893), Colby (1894), Eisen (1885, 1897, 1901), Wythes (1902), Starnes (1903), Starnes and Monroe (1907), Bunyard and Thomas (1904), Dean (1904), Roeding (1914), Mills (1914, 1918), W S. Anderson (1924), Condit (1921a, 1921c, 1923, 1925, 1933, 1947), E. A. Bunyard (1925), and Blin (1942).

Illustration of tree by Eisen (1901) and Condit (1921a, 1933); fruit figured by Condit (1921a). For color plates see Carbon (1865b) and Associated Grower (Fresno), November, 1922.

The Franciscana (Mission) fig was introduced at San Diego about 1768 from mission stations in Baja California, and until the middle of the past century was practically the only variety grown in the early settlements. In 1882, West reported that it was too well known to need description, and added that it was the only black fig of his acquaintance that was of any value for drying. Eisen, in 1885, stated that this variety was not good for drying, but in later publications described it as a fig which dried well. In his bulletin of 1901 we read: “The general belief that the Mission is a distinct California fig is erroneous. We can no more lay exclusive claim to this fig than can Mexico and Chile. It was undoubtedly brought from Spain or Portugal at a very early date after the conquest.”

About 1909, Eisen identified the “Mission” as Franciscana, of Spain, but the exact reference to his publication has not been located. In 1925, Condit wrote, after personal observations in Spain: “The Franciscana is a black fig commonly grown at Estepona, over sixty miles below Málaga, on the coast. Dried figs of this variety seen at Motril appeared to be identical to the California Mission.” It seems to be the same variety that Escribano y Perez described in 1884 as Higuera Negra, of Murcia Province, where it was much esteemed both for fresh fruit and for drying. The following two introductions from Málaga into California have proved to be identical with the Franciscana: P.I. No. 58,664 as Negra, and P.I. No. 62,777 as Brebal.

Three varieties imported from England with the Chiswick collection, P.I. No. 18,875 as Biberaeo, No. 18,896 as Gouraud Noir, and No. 18,868 as Reculver, also produce fruit like that of the Franciscana. The first two are described by Eisen as distinct varieties, but the characters listed by him coincide almost exactly with those of the Franciscana. According to E. A. Bunyard (1925), the name Reculver comes from Reculver, Kent, England, where this fig was introduced by the Romans. Dean, in 1904, described Reculver as a prolific fig tree with small, purple fruits.

Another introduction of the Chiswick collection, P.I. No. 18,867, labeled Douro Vebra, bore fruit very similar to the Franciscana. According to Barron (1891), Douro Vebra is the same as Biberaeo. In the original notebook of John Rock, Niles, dated 1895, there are outline drawings and notes of California Black, Biberaeo, and Reculver. Under the short description of Reculver there appears this line in the handwriting of Gustav Eisen: “Leaves mottled, as on Mission.” This unpublished note, we might point out here, is probably the first observation made on the occurrence of a leaf mosaic on the fig in California.

Although it appears strange that Eisen should not have considered the above three kinds to be the same as Franciscana, they are being treated here as identical with that variety.

The Franciscana fig has long been grown in the eastern and southern United States. Trees have been observed on the original Arlington estate of the Custis family near Cape Charles, Virginia, and on a neighboring farm; also at the Virginia Truck Experiment Station, Norfolk, and at the Hampton Institute. The probable reasons for the lack in popularity of the variety in these districts are the susceptibility of trees to frost damage, and their light productivity. W. S. Anderson reported in 1924 that in south Mississippi, “the Black Mission was injured more than any other variety by the cold, and produced very few fruits.” On the other hand, the fruit was of the highest quality, “standing up better when left on the tree during the rainy season than any other variety in the test.” Woodard (1940) showed that in Georgia, the Mission was much inferior to Celeste in fruit production. Wythes (1902) reported Gouraud Noir, or Dr. Hogg’s black fig, to be a fine flavored fruit, and excellent for pot culture in England.

Franciscana trees are widely distributed in California, both as individual trees and in commercial plantings. Immense specimens are found, especially in the foothills of the interior valleys (plate 5). The one figured by Condit in 1919 near Corning, with a trunk circumference of 13-1/2 feet, has disappeared; but there are others just as large, or larger. Another and older tree, still growing on the William Curtner place near Mission San Jose, is reported to have been planted about 1800. Mills (1918) tells of other large specimens. During seasons with unusually low temperatures, trees of this variety are more subject to injury than are trees of other commercial kinds, as pointed out by Shinn (1892) and Hodgson (1934). On account of the productive capacity of the trees, resistance of the fruit to spoilage, and excellent quality both fresh and dried, the Franciscana has long enjoyed an excellent reputation. The main objection to it commercially is the black skin color, which practically prohibits use of the dried fruit in fig paste.

The tree is a vigorous grower, with branches rather slender (plate 4), the larger often drooping to the ground and taking root at the tip; terminal buds are violet-brown. Leaves large, averaging 7-5/8 inches broad and 8 inches in length; lobes mostly 5, but sometimes 3, or on vigorous wood with each basal lobe auricled; upper surface somewhat glossy. Mosaic spots common and conspicuous on leaves and fruit, but seldom sufficiently serious to cause alarm on the part of growers.

Breba crop good in most seasons; fruits large, up to 2 inches in diameter and 3 inches in length, pyriform, with prominent, thick neck, often 1/2 inch long; average weight 56 grams; stalk short and thick; ribs fairly prominent, slightly raised, generally coloring earlier than body; eye medium, scales purple; surface glossy, with pruinose bloom; white flecks prominent, scattered; skin checking lengthwise at full maturity; color black; meat thin, white, or slightly colored; pulp light strawberry, solid; flavor rich, decidedly characteristic of the fig. Quality excellent. Widely used fresh for local and distant markets, and frequently dried.

Second-crop figs variable in size and shape, larger and longer in cool coastal climates than in the interior, as reported by Condit (1950); average weight near Los Angeles 41 grams, at Riverside 25 grams; size medium; shape pyriform, with thick neck, or often without neck; body 1-1/2 to 1-3/4 inches in length; stalk short, thick; ribs narrow, only slightly elevated; eye small to medium, fairly well closed, scales violet; surface dull, with conspicuous bloom; flecks of white at first prominent, as shown by Condit (1941 a, fig. 9, F), becoming obscured by body color; skin checking at complete maturity; color black over entire surface; pulp amber to light strawberry; flavor distinctive, rich. Quality excellent, both fresh and dried.

Caprified figs somewhat larger; average weight 56 grams; pulp dark strawberry; seeds large, fertile. These figs are not regarded favorably, however, by dried-fig packers because of greater loss by spoilage.

Family
Black Mission
Type
Common
Readily Available?
Yes
Gateway?
More Photos @ Figs4Fun

Reviews

Other Comments

Main Crop

Main Season
Main Flavor Group
Main Skin Color
Main Pulp Color
Main Eye
Main Flesh Color
Main Drying Suitable?
Main Preserves Suitable?
Main Additional Notes

Breba Crop

Breba?
Breba Skin Color
Breba Pulp Color
Breba Flesh Color
Breba Eye
Breba Flavor Group
Breba Drying Suitable?
Breba Preserves Suitable?
Breba Wasps Required?
Breba Additional Notes

Climate

Cold Hardy?
Zone
Wind Resistant?
Good Container Variety?
Easy Rooting?
Additional Climate Notes

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This