LSU Champagne

LSU Champagne

General

Variety
LSU Champagne
Favorite

Favorited By 3 Users

Average Overall Rating

Overall Rating:(17)

AKA

Champagne, L55-13-22

Variety Strains
Description

An OFFICIAL LSU release. Many confuse Champagne with Scott's Yellow and/or Golden Celeste, which seem to have very different characteristics and are distinct varieties.

Ross Raddi: 8/10 - It's the fig pictured on the right. Flavor is of your typical honey fig, but it performs better than any other I have. One of my best overall producers. Can be picked only 4-5 days after it starts to swell. Holds up to rain well. Closed eye. I wonder how this does in hotter climates like Texas, Arizona & California. Competes for sure with the best honey figs I've eaten. Still an 8, but easily could be a 9 to someone that's more of a honey fig fan. [on comparing to LSU Gold similarity] In flavor yes. In all other characteristics, no. Champagne is smaller, rain resistant and earlier. A keeper in short season/rainy climates. LSU Gold turns into a bag of honey when it rains.

Champagne is a hybrid releases from the Louisiana State University agricultural program. It is a cross between 'Celeste' and C1 which is a Capri fig from California. It has small fruit with yellow to green skin and golden flesh. Champagne has a slightly rounded end that tapers towards the stem and a short neck. The eye is partially closed on mature fruit. It ripens in Early September here in Zone 6. The flavor of this fig is Honey, Its sweet and creamy with a hint of seed crunch.

From LSU Ag:

‘Champagne’ fig (Ficus carica L.) was developed by the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station (LAES) to provide a productive, good-quality fruit that ripens during the traditional fig harvesting period. ‘Champagne’ is a common-type fig and the fourth cultivar released from the LAES fig breeding program that was initiated in the 1950s to develop cultivars for the gulf south region (O’Rourke et al., 2004). ‘Champagne’ was evaluated in plantings at research stations located at The Burden Center, Baton Rouge, LA (long. 3024#3$ N, lat. 916#2$ W) and at the Citrus Research Station at Port Sulfur, LA (long. 2929#7$ N, lat. 8942#7$ W). This selection (L55-13-22) was chosen for release because of superior fruiting characteristics.

Parentage: ‘Champagne’ is a selection from a group of seedlings derived from a cross of ‘Celeste’ · ‘C1’. ‘C1’ is a designation given a caprifig obtained from the University of California at Riverside in 1950. The cross was made in 1955 and the selection was made by E. O’Rourke in 1959 and was tested as L55- 13-22.

Description: Fruit. A comparison of syconium (fruit) characteristics of seven cultivars of commontype figs was made in the summer of 2008 using fruit from 8-year-old trees growing at Burden Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA. Sixteen uniformly firm, ripe fruit were harvested from each tree in the canopy periphery 1.5 m from ground level. Plots were replicated three times with one tree per plot. Fruit were immediately taken to the laboratory for evaluation. Each replicate was weighted and divided into two lots for measuring soluble solids and color. Fruit from one lot of each cultivar were peeled and macerated. Approximately 3 mL of pulp was used to determine percent soluble solids using a benchtop refractometer. A 20-mL sample of the macerated pulp was used to determine internal fruit color using a Minolta CM3500d spectrophotometer (Minolta Instrument Systems, Ramsey, NJ) standardized with a white calibration plate (Minolta CM-A120). External fruit color was determined objectively by placing whole fruit from each cultivar on the eye lens of the spectrophotometer along the equator of each fruit. Four fruit were measured for external color at two points along the equator of each fruit and the L, a, and b measurements averaged. The fruit of ‘Champagne’ is persistent and does not require pollination. Fruit have a slightly round distal end and taper slightly toward the stem end with a short neck (Fig. 1). ‘Champagne’ produces good-quality, 30- to 40-mm diameter, and moderate-sized (23 g) yellow fruit (Table 1). The fruit has a partially closed eye (ostiole) on mature fruit. Internal color is gold to caramel color when soft ripe (Table 2). Ripening occurs about the same time as ‘Celeste’, which is usually the first week of July in Baton Rouge, LA. The main crop of ‘Champagne’ ripens over a 15-d period, which is comparable to ‘Celeste’ and ‘Kadota’. Trees and foliage. Trees of ‘Champagne’ are vigorous, producing upright trunks and, if left not pruned, will produce a pyramidshaped tree. Very little horizontal growth was observed in the juvenile phase. Foliage cover is sparse when compared with ‘Celeste’. Mature leaves of ‘Champagne’ are palmate with five distinct lobes. The primary lobe is spatulate. Basal lobes are cordate with slight serrations. Disease resistance. Trees of fig cultivars with known degrees of susceptibility to late summer defoliation were grown in a research orchard at Burden Center at Baton Rouge, LA. Field notes were recorded annually in late summer on the degree of defoliation of each tree. ‘Champagne’ is slightly more resistant to defoliation caused by the fig leaf rust [Cerotelium fici (E.J. Butler) Arthur] and leaf spot [Pseudocercospora fici (Heald & F.A Wolf · J. Liu & Y. L. Guo) = Cercospori fici] complex than ‘Celeste’. Symptoms caused by the two pathogens often appear at the same time creating difficulty in separating the two diseases under field conditions as to which one causes defoliation.

Culture:  ‘Champagne’ is a common-type fig that is very productive and has performed well in grower trials and home orchards. This selection has previously been unofficially named and propagated as ‘Golden Celeste’; however, ‘Golden Celeste’ is not necessarily the same as ‘Champagne’. ‘Champagne’ will not replace any currently recommended cultivar but offers some unique marketing characteristics (Pyzner, 2005). The yellow color is somewhat unique and should present a marketing opportunity for local markets. This selection should complement the recommendation list by increasing the diversity of fruit types. A marketing limitation that should be noted is the tendency of the fruit of ‘Champagne’ to have a partially closed eye at maturity. Under humid conditions, this could increase the amount of fruit spoilage compared with ‘Celeste’. However, field notes have not denoted a greater tendency for fruit spoilage than other cultivars. When the fruit is harvested at the proper stage for processing (firm ripe), this should not present a problem.

Pedigree
Condit Monograph

n/a

Collection
LSU (Official)
Availability Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Beginner Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Origin
Louisiana, US

Images

Currently, the image credits are not displaying properly in some browsers. It may by necessary to "hover" over an image to see the image credit.

Main Crop

Main Earliness Rating (5=early, 1=late)

Average Rating:(1)

Main Yield Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Main GDD
2000
Main Ripening Days
Main Primary Flavors
Honey
Main Additional Flavors
Main Primary Flavor (New - In Process)
Main Secondary Flavor (New - In Process)
Main Flavor Notes (New - In Process)
Main Flavor Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Main Seed Crunch Rating (1=none-little, 5=heavy)

Average Rating:(1)

Main Eye Opening Rating (1=large/open, 5=tight)

Average Rating:(1)

Main Eye Description
Main Fruit Drop Resistance Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Main Split Resistance Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Main Rain Tolerance Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Main Uses
Fresh
Main Additional Notes

Ripens about the same time as Celeste.

Breba Crop

Breba Yield Rating

Average Rating:(0)

Breba GDD
Breba Flavor (Difference from Main)
Breba Primary Flavor (New - In Process)
Breba Secondary Flavor (New - In Process)
Breba Flavor Notes
Breba Ripening Days
Breba Eye Description
Breba Uses
Breba Additional Notes

Climate

Vigor Rating

Average Rating:(1)

In Ground Zone
Produces After Die-back Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Lignified Wood Winter Survival Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Rooting Ease Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Container Adaptable Rating

Average Rating:(1)

RKN Resistance Rating

Average Rating:(1)

FMV Resistance Rating

Average Rating:(1)

Additional Notes

Pin It on Pinterest